Shemeka Laker: I tend to think that any poll that has an agenda is capable of "slanting" things to go the way they intend.For example, if I wanted to prove that "the people" were against gun control, I would poll subscribers to "Guns & Ammo", and, military personnel.... With that dynamic, I could easily prove that nearly everyone polled agreed......I trust no polls except zogby and political exit polls.* Usajustice- I support the cause and not one of those "rules" you listed apply to me. None. White- 6 generations here-from Wales. Husband is 4 generations (atleast) from England. He owns a high-tech computer firm. Few employees - all born here. Sorry, generalization is not true*...Show more
Ramona Pago: I agree with Amanda, not about illegal aliens, but about polls.There are those on here that are fond of cutting and pasting a massive list of polls as if that somehow "wins" their argument or debate for them. It seems as if there are as many "polls" as there ar! e people sometimes...and by picking and choosing, you can use polls to support your agenda.Obviously polls matter little in the grand scheme of things. Much more important is VOTING!!!...Show more
Silvia Stclair: I'm not sure on this but dont most credible poll takers only talk to registered voters?
Stevie Kizziar: doubt it...though I agree with Amanda
Donny Bankson: I just took one. It was in Spanish????Just kidding.I agree with Amanda.
Monica Voltin: Yes I do. The current Gallup poll shows that 62% of all Americans feel illegals should be made to leave the US, even though they are trying to slant the results.****just a comment****Amanda H --- you trust political exit polls? WHY? Didn't you pay attention to the last 3 elections? They were ALL wrong. Why? Because certain voting blocks feel that we have secret ballots for a reason and think it's none of anyone else's business how we vote. They feel that political exit polls are intrusive and I! have to say I agree....Show more
Frederic Engellant: wh! y hell yea
Emeline Albracht: have you ever heard of the U.S. suited courtroom decision in Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982)? The state of Texas had created a regulation (might 1975) requiring that each and all and sundry infants enrolled interior the everyday public colleges be the two U.S. voters or legal immigrants -- prohibiting illegals. a sprint extra advantageous than 2 years later a lawsuit replaced into filed in Tyler, TX complicated the regulation as a contravention of the 14th modification's assure of the equivalent protection of the guidelines. All 3 stages of the federal courts got here to an analogous hassle-unfastened end -- the regulation is unconstitutionally discriminatory. The U.S. suited courtroom's ruling replaced into by using a narrow margin, 5 to 4, with Justice Brennan writing the everyday public opinion, for himself and Justices Blackmun, Marshall, Powell, and Stevens. (In previous situations, Justices Blackmun and Powell had taken the view t! hat the state might constitutionally ban legal immigrants from jobs as cops (Foley v. Connelie, 435 U.S. 291 (1978)) and that obtaining an coaching isn't a constitutionally assured ordinary top (San Antonio autonomous college District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. a million (1973)).) My "well-liked" (notice the sarcasm) area of Brennan's opinion for the courtroom is, "this is complicated to understand precisely what the State hopes to realize by using merchandising the advent and perpetuation of a subclass of illiterates interior of our limitations, truthfully including to the subject concerns and fees of unemployment, welfare, and crime." What a swell interest of expertise the motives of the Texas legislature. Six years after the Plyler decision, Professor David P. Currie, writing a 2-volume textual content referred to as "The shape interior the acceptable courtroom," had harsh words for this actual decision. He wrote, "With all due comprehend, this is donning solicitude a sprint! a techniques. Public factors are scarce and people who have not got an! y employer being here could have undesirable declare on them. i ought to have a top to maintain a burglar out of my homestead, the courtroom seems to be saying, yet as quickly as he's there i ought to invite him to dinner." This ruling by using the courtroom is one the numerous motives I even have for disliking the SC. And my dislike is so stable that it keeps me faraway from the balloting sales area. i did no longer vote in 2004 and that i won't vote next month and that i will in all probability under no circumstances vote returned. via SC....Show more
Pasquale Pollet: Their opinion should not count, which is why illegal immigrants cannot vote. It may sound harsh, but it is a right only governed to legal US citizens.
Lu Snide: Who else would be supporting them?There are only a couple of reasons anyone would support illegal aliens.1) They are an illegal alien.2) Their parent(s) are illegal aliens ( they are anchor babies).3) Other family members are illegal ali! ens.4) Their girlfriend/boyfriend is an illegal alien.5) They are an employer of illegal aliens, (so are profiting off of crime at the expense of the taxpayers).6) Some of the above.7) All of the above.If you asked every person who supports illegal aliens these questions, no doubt 99% of them would answer YES to at least one of them....Show more
No comments:
Post a Comment